saving . . . saved Missing face in the boundary list has been deleted. Missing face in the boundary list has been hidden .
Missing face in the boundary list
Title
Question
Why is the face shared by two blocks, the one with vertices 2, 3, 9 & 8, not defined in the ‘boundary’ list?

OpenFOAM-version-7 Multi-block-Meshing-of-a-2D-Geometry-in-OpenFOAM 08-09 min 40-50 sec 24-09-20, 7:02 p.m. hbammkanti

Answers:

Only the faces that require a boundary condition to be imposed need to be defined in the ‘boundary’ list. The internal face, in this case the one defined by vertices 2, 3, 9 & 8, does not require any boundary condition and is therefore not defined.

Regards,
Ashley
25-09-20, 12:22 a.m. ashleymelvin1193@gmail.com


Log-in to answer to this question.